1. FTW,He's cluless.The only delusion that even existed was the delusion that at some point,he didn't cower like a little girl.
2. Atheist followers are being led by this joker? LMAO XD
3. so where's your missing link then?.... you idiot, just accept that there's things beyond you and us all... apart from proven statements from Jesus Christ, and his forebearers.... just have faith instead of trying to disprove something your quite clearly not qualified to comment on
4. wow, he is a bigger weasel than I had previously thought.
5. ☻ /▌\ I AM CREATED ! / \
6. Dawkins doesn't believe in evolution deep down in his heart, BUT, he realises that he can become well known and earn a lot of money writing dumb books, because human beings are so vulnerable !!
7. hahaahaha!!! noooo..he wanted to say that he is a fish, with the memorie status of 3 second.... :)
8. lol hes clueless!!
9. lol hahahhaa! Stupid Evolutionist!
10. LOL
11. LOL XD lmao rofl !!!
12. WOW LMAO Richard Dawkins is truly an idiot, along with his Atheistic belief's.
13. he didnt answer the question at all
14. Mercy, mercy, Mr. Dawkins. What a shame. Thank you for the video.
15. That is hilarious. I would bet a large sum of money that if someone were to repost this video, titling it "Richard Dawkins Proves Evolution", most evolutinists, and theistic evolutionists specifically, would treat it as science and compromise their beliefs yet again. Evolution is a joke. When I have money someday, I will put a million dollar reward up for anyone who can bring me proof of evolution.
16. Why is this guy famous?
17. Hi guys. Those interested in reading comments that have been posted, you will need to click "SHOW SPAM MESSAGES" (you may have to click "page2" of comments first). Someone has gone through and marked all comments as SPAM and they therefore do not get listed automatically. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards, JJjayco
18. RESPONSE PART 2 of 2 To believe in theistic evolution means believing that God called billions of years of suffering, death, extinction, bloodshed and cruelty 'all very good' - and not the results of the Fall and the subsequent Curse on Creation, as the Apostle Paul understood it. creationontheweb . com /content/view/3055/ Copy this URL into your browser to see other articles on this topic.
19. RESPONSE PART 1 of 2 Dr Collins' response glosses over the huge problems involved in theistic evolution - the God of the Bible is the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, who believed in a real Flood, a literal Adam and Eve who literally fell into sin, and a recent creation (in which people were there from the beginning of the creation, not millions of years later, towards the end of some long creation process - see Mark 10:6).
20. RESPONSE PART 2 of 2 To believe in theistic evolution means believing that God called billions of years of suffering, death, extinction, bloodshed and cruelty 'all very good' - and not the results of the Fall and the subsequent Curse on Creation, as the Apostle Paul understood it. creationontheweb . com /content/view/3055/ Copy this URL into your browser to see other articles on this topic.
21. RESPONSE PART 1 of 2 Dr Collins' response glosses over the huge problems involved in theistic evolution - the God of the Bible is the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, who believed in a real Flood, a literal Adam and Eve who literally fell into sin, and a recent creation (in which people were there from the beginning of the creation, not millions of years later, towards the end of some long creation process - see Mark 10:6).
22. Err, well, ummm, doh! Great video!
23. looooooool....stumped like a polititian. Sounds like Tony Blair lieing.
24. Even kids understand that their Christmas/birthday gifts did not materialise out of thin air, but were PLACED THERE BY SOMEONE, though they did not see them. We all know that the existence of every Tangible Product can be traced to a Responsible Maker/Agent. (Eg, buildings, cars, ships, roads, computers, crime, whatever). The hypocrisy of atheists is the belief in the above principle, but the blatant denial of the same principle where earth/humans are concerned.
25. Wow! Did I miss it, or did he completely gloss over the actual question?

Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question (RAW FTGE)

1.92 min. | 2.2 ocjene korisnika | 1674328 vidjeno

**MUST READ!! http://creation.com/dawkins-stumped And for a true timeline of events on the actual day of filming, see here (VERY INTERESTING READING): http://www.tccsa.tc/video/timeline.pdf and for further reading still (it's somewhat technical and long, but underlines that the question cannot be answered in a way that supports evolutionary notions): http://www.trueorigin.org/dawkinfo.asp Richard Dawkins is dumbfounded after being asked to "give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome" - quite a reasonable question that one would expect Oxford University's Professor for the Public Understanding of Science - so adamant in his belief in evolution - could and would provide an answer for. He then responds but DOES NOT answer the question that was asked of him. Why? Because he has no idea when it comes to processes that add information to the genome - the very premise of what he proclaims!! His writings claiming that he was not stumped are a desperate endeavour to cover his cowardly tracks (and on a further note, his writings don't cover any of these "information adding" processes either). Check out the URL on the video (or above) for THE REAL EXPLANATION OF EVENTS!! And for even more insight into Dawkins' lack of enthusiasm to be interviewed by creationists, check out the belowmentioned CD. Dawkins was put to shame in a debate against creationists in 1986 at Oxford University and was left so speechless and defeated that he decided never to grant creationists with publicity time again - this policy was adopted not because he simply does not want to grant creationists with the publicity as he so cowardly insists, but because he is terrified his reputation will be tainted by his inability to front up to creationist arguments head-on (as this YOUTUBE video proves). The CD is available from the following link: http://creation.com/Oxford Don't be as "ignorant" as creationists allegedly are - delve a little deeper and you will be surprised at what you'll find. NB: The reasons for posting this video is not to disprove evolution or to prove creation - but merely to show that this man who is at the forefront of the modern-day evolutionist movement does not have an answer for the most fundamental question to what he proclaims. There are actually three processes [at the time of writing] that scientists know of that add information to the genome - none of which Dawkins covers in any of his responses - websites, books or otherwise.
Tag: dawkins creationism evolution genetics creation ministries genome